Useful briefs, not magic phrases.

Learning material

Create eight conditional probability exercises for Grade 11, increasing in difficulty. Provide solutions in a separate section and show the essential calculations.

Useful details: topic, level, amount, difficulty and whether to include solutions.

Reviewing text

Review the following text for clarity and internal contradictions. Identify each specific passage, explain the issue and propose a correction. Preserve my intended message.

Useful details: audience, review criteria, tone and how extensively to edit.

Planning research

Compare these three options using the following criteria: [add criteria]. Prefer primary sources, state the date of the information and flag missing evidence. If you cannot research, provide a verifiable research plan.

Diagnosing code

This error occurs in this environment: [environment and error]. Expected behaviour: [behaviour]. Minimal example: [code]. Find the cause and suggest the smallest suitable change, including a way to check it.

Extra service: improve an answer

Already included: enter your original task, an existing AI answer and specific feedback. The builder turns these into a follow-up prompt. Your chosen AI performs the actual review.

Other useful services

• Source checking: A future service could open references and check whether they support the associated claims. This requires real research, not just templates.
• Comparing two answers: A short evaluation form could compare task completion, correctness and editing required.
• Breaking a project into steps: A dedicated assistant could turn a large goal into small, verifiable tasks.
• Education and editorial templates: Subject-specific forms could later complement LearnForReal and PreLearning with exercises, text reviews and study plans.

A link check only tests accessibility; the proposed source check would also compare the content with the specific claim. These four ideas are proposed extensions, not automated services implemented in this version.