Back to the prompt builder

THE REPAIR LIBRARY

Improve an AI answer

The answer missed the mark? Choose the problem and create a focused follow-up instruction for your AI.

Original templates · not yet comparatively tested for answer quality

These cards help you phrase instructions. They do not automatically evaluate your answer or promise a particular improvement.

12 / 12 cards shown

01Content & evidence

The answer is too generic

Turn general statements into specific, usable guidance.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Original task, previous answer and your specific goal; useful constraints under “More details”.
What a suitable revision looks like
The answer addresses your goal and gives concrete steps consistent with your information.
Template limitation
Without a goal or context, the AI cannot derive a tailored solution.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
02Content & evidence

Part of the task is missing

Fill in the requested parts that were left out.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Paste the complete original task; optionally identify the missing part in the correction instructions.
What a suitable revision looks like
Every original requirement is fulfilled or its limitation is explained.
Template limitation
The completeness of the original task must still be checked by the user.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
03Content & evidence

Numbers or facts were changed

Preserve the content during language editing.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Put the source text in the original task or “More details”; paste the AI revision under “Previous answer”.
What a suitable revision looks like
Names, values, units and statements match the source; concerns appear separately.
Template limitation
Faithfulness to the source does not establish that the source is factually correct.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
04Content & evidence

Details were invented

Separate supported content, assumptions and open questions.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Original task, previous answer and the material or verifiable evidence the answer should rely on.
What a suitable revision looks like
Important factual claims have identifiable support; assumptions and missing evidence are visible.
Template limitation
The AI may still overlook errors. Check important claims against original sources yourself.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
05Content & evidence

Sources are missing or unsuitable

Ask whether the evidence actually supports each claim.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Previous answer including citations; accessible original sources or relevant excerpts where possible.
What a suitable revision looks like
Important claims have matching evidence; unchecked sources are not presented as verified.
Template limitation
Without browsing or supplied source text, the target AI cannot inspect link contents. AGIbeamer does not open sources here.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
06Structure & clarity

The output format is wrong

Put the existing answer into the format you need.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Specify the target format in the correction instructions or choose it under “More details”; state columns or keys for tables/JSON.
What a suitable revision looks like
The answer follows the requested structure and is usable in the intended way.
Template limitation
Actual Word or PDF creation depends on the target AI. Structured data still needs checking.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
07Code & changes

The code is incomplete

Request the full agreed deliverable.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Supply existing code, filenames, language/version and change scope. For large projects, provide relevant excerpts or files to the target AI.
What a suitable revision looks like
Every agreed file is complete; dependencies and unperformed checks are explicit.
Template limitation
A prompt cannot remove context/output limits. Check generated code before production use.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
08Code & changes

Too many parts were changed

Keep revisions within the agreed scope.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Supply the original version, problematic revision and exact allowed sections or files; identify good parts under “What should be kept?”.
What a suitable revision looks like
Comparing with the original reveals only agreed changes.
Template limitation
Hidden dependencies may require changes outside the scope; these need separate clarification.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
09Structure & clarity

The explanation is too difficult

Make terms and steps easier to understand.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Previous explanation and ideally the audience, grade or prior knowledge; identify the confusing passage.
What a suitable revision looks like
The audience can understand the explanation without technical distortion.
Template limitation
Clarity is individual. A plausible example does not guarantee understanding.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
10Structure & clarity

The answer is too long

Remove repetition while retaining the essentials.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Previous answer and optionally a target word count, paragraph count or number of bullets.
What a suitable revision looks like
The shorter answer retains essential information without unnecessary repetition.
Template limitation
Heavy shortening can reduce precision. Check mandatory information and important qualifications.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
11Structure & clarity

The AI asks unnecessary questions

Make useful progress with the information available.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Include the original task, previous questions and answers already supplied.
What a suitable revision looks like
Resolved points are not asked again; necessary open decisions remain visible.
Template limitation
Genuinely unclear or consequential decisions may still require a question.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality
12Content & evidence

The revision damaged good parts

Keep what worked and repair only the problem.

Inputs, success criteria and limits
What you need
Provide the previous answer, specific problem and good parts; use “What should be kept?” in particular.
What a suitable revision looks like
The problem is fixed while the identified good parts are retained.
Template limitation
Conflicts between preservation and necessary correction must be resolved explicitly.
Source status
Original editorial template; not an external recommendation reproduced here
Test status
Not yet comparatively tested for answer quality